|
intelpentium5 (August 11, 2008 at 4:31 pm)
yeah .the 3.3s i heard destroyed the casing
Moparman58 (August 11, 2008 at 4:12 pm)
yea chrysler had the shittiest trannys then.
intelpentium5 (August 11, 2008 at 5:24 am)
3.3 got transmission issues thou
ajmcguinness334 (August 4, 2008 at 12:00 pm)
Yeah
Moparman58 (June 19, 2008 at 5:43 pm)
Yea they were fast and they did suck down a lot of oil. I have one in my van.
Voltor07 (June 19, 2008 at 6:42 am)
I had a Dynasty with the 3.0. It would do 60mph in 2nd gear. It required a quart of oil whenever I needed gas, but that engine lasted longer than the car.
Moparman58 (June 18, 2008 at 3:28 am)
3.3L are way better, but the 3.0 never dies just smokes and does stupid shit.
chrisofthetube (June 13, 2008 at 11:31 pm)
fwd aint got a chance!
OmegaM41 (June 13, 2008 at 10:58 pm)
Well, I'm not sure about other 3.3s vs. 3.0s, but the 3.3 in the Floppy Cock has been brought back from the dead twice (seized and hydrolocked), so it seems pretty durable.
GeoMetroMan91 (June 13, 2008 at 7:53 pm)
what the fuck ever!!! the 3.0 NEVER DIES. I have seen so many dead 3.3L engines that its unbelieveable |
