|
KufrAkbar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Maybe this is just an excerpt from a movie -- the Soviet equivalent of Ed Wood. The behavior of those soldiers is pretty theatrical. The clothing looks a bit artificial too: shiny boots, spotless coats.
tjamassey (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Could easily be faked but it would take a little money for the costumes and props etc.Not done by your average amateur for sure.Yes there was no autofocus back then either!
lanxatdadisco (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this is what you get when you drink and drive
iscommunity (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You decide what this is. The video is REAL. Anyone who says it isnt real should wake up. The only thing that can be doubted is what this object is. The video CANNOT be doubted! The video is REAL!!However, the crashed object could also be a CIA craft.
oishin68 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
All is authentic..soldiers,year of made,inspector of KGB,documents..etc,but only fake is UFO who is crashes in trees(my opinion corrs)P.S.Sorry for my bad english.
CCCamikaze (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
it's a documental from history channel
superpana51 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
the video is truth ... the ex KGB says that video was top secret
grimysoldja (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
look mcrc07045 your argument is irrelevant to the point i was making, wich was -you cant determine a type of camera by looking at a shadow that is hardly visible. i am no expert on old cameras and quite frankly dont care. also i have never claimed that this footage is of a ufo and personally i dont think it is, however i have seen a ufo with my own eyes and that is why i have an intrest in vids like this!!!
mcrc07045 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hey Grim, they have auto-focus and auto/electic-zoom! The ONLY zoom they had in the 50's on the best studio color cameras, you know the big cams they shot TV shows with, had a series of 3-4 lenses that can be spun from 1 lens to another exatly like a modern microscope. Do you now realize this is NOT authentic? If not, look up the JFK assination and compare the quality of the color portable cams from the 60's to this video fr the 50's. Sorry...
mcrc07045 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
With the film reels it is as large as a briefcase, not square though, I'll give u that. More importantly is the frame rate, portable cams from pre 60's did not give that smooth a picture, never and the smaller cams had to be manually cranked so the speed was always inconsistent and usually fast, this film is perfectly smooth. Impossible. |