locmcdog (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Omg 126.387 views only For this Songs !this shows how clever the Peoples are and what things do they like .. Respect to Vangelis !

piergiorgiovico (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Tami grazie per il bellissimo video del mio mondo!il futuro non lo sapremo forse mai prevedere!!! e' il buio dell'Universo! 5+5*ciao

alexlollol747 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Splendido !

alexlollol747 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Splendido !

xegran (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Música que no ha sido superada en mucho tiempo.El reto sigue abierto!!.

AZHRAM1982 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

muy bueno, gracias

wagnerologist1984 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Yeh nature, its a fickle mistress.All we need is a Hiesenberg compensator, christ knows how that would work!

jing4rs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Thanks for the reply i think ive worked it out now. Classical physics says that the probability distibution is one overall in the box, as its either there or not (so on a distibution graph would be a straight line). Same for Quantum as its an infinite well. Damn Hiesenberg principle!! Nature tries its hardest to keep its secrets hey

wagnerologist1984 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Not sure what it would LOOK like. Im no expert but i assume every particle's trajectory could be correctly predicted, without the Hiesenberg principle. Extend this idea to every particle in the Universe, you could theoretically predict the future.

jing4rs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Can anyone tell me what the probability distribution for a particle in a box would look like in classical physics, not quantum, on a probabilty distribution graph at n=3 (nth energy level)