stew1213 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

KevinPlyr01 speaks the total truth w2g man you r so right

clyde0007 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

looser get a job stay off crack

eVoDeon (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Looks like crap, but serves a purpose.

KevinPlyr01 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

HP=GAYYYYYYYYY! trust me, no one is better than dell, belive or not, itst he best, and ALWAYS WILL BE!

gianboy2001 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

ohh yah for sure.. its jst that the compatibility with periperal is not that wide yet... it be good if you get wide selection for everything. right =)

xelink (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

might be because at lower resolutions(say 1600*1200) a single 7900GTX maxes most thigns out and has significantly higher memory bandwidth. there is little reason for quad SLI in the average enviroment, only monitors that take advantage of it are the 32 inch goliaths and those have horribel image quality compared to their smaller siblings which kind of negates the point.

xelink (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

BTX is a better design realy.there's a reason why inverted ATX is becoming a fad in enthusiast camps...

rustygates (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

2 7900GTX's in SLi beats 1 7950GX2?...no7900GTX in SLi gets around 10000 on 3d mark '06 and a 7950GX2 gets around 9000 on 3d mark '06. But DAM! one gx2 is a hell powerful card to get nearly enough as 2 7900GTX's. Also, the over pricing of this machine does not come from the parts, it comes from the chassis design. that case would cost a crap load.

bluE5515 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

sif use 7900GTX's when 7950gx2 owns the crap out of it

gianboy2001 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I HATE BTX MOTHERBOARD... If this was atx i'd probly get one.. buttt grrrrrr btx... soo hard to get components tahts compatible with this damn btx