|
zbox720 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Could someone please explain why they dont just use this, OR the Cougar (or similar)??? I'm confused!
heas4300 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Ghost ReconAdvanced War FighterMuch?
MilitaryGiant (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The Stryker can easily get stuck in mud plenty of photos on the web to show it. I think it would of been better to fit caterpillar tracks to it so it can go over rough ground.
canariojoe (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
sure we would do a lot better withm113 gavins w/ a catapulta :P
canariojoe (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
something sure: they are going to "run-flat" :P
canariojoe (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
which ones ? :P
grannman (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
probably sheer versatility by the look of it.
kuutamo2003 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
well, there is much higher quality and more modern armed personal carriers available .. so I wonder why peope are seeing this Stryker so great ...
260191894 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
yeah, and they're a rubber core allowing it to roll on rubber in case if it blows up or something...
strykerAPC (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
sweet vehicle! even the varient with the 105mm gun. |
