noisbuff (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This happens because there is no scientific proof in creationism. It cannot be proven or dis proven. Well, you would have to do your research using many different sources. If you believe everything this guy says, either you are being lazy, or really don't understand the discussion. He makes claims about replicas being bad to research yet he goes around with his giant thigh bone (a replica)that has no original. =)

proudjester (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Numerous instances made by whom?And where are these papers?Maybe it's because the bulk of creationists have no idea what they're doing?

tjokie (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"If you have something to say, put it in a scientific journal and let the world community decide the validity. That's what's been done with evolution, so now do it with creationism and either have it accepted or shut up about it."There are numerous instances of creationists attempting this but failing. Creationism is always excluded from scientific amaerican. Even past evolutionary writers who have become creatinists are then fired. Maybe its because evolution looks stupid next to the truth?

Plafcan25 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Well said, sir.

prospero811 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Hovind is one big argument from personal incredulity.

D33veeoss (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Evolution is a theory. Some others that you might know about areTheory of Gravityand the work they're doing with quantum physics.Furthermore, if you see feathers, see webbed feet and hear a quack, you think DUCK.And you cannot be faulted for it.If you have something to say, put it in a scientific journal and let the world community decide the validity.That's what's been done with evolution, so now do it with creationism and either have it accepted or shut up about it.

webfryes (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Thats because evolution is a lie and it is very dangerous.

D33veeoss (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

FAR MORE critical attemepting to disprove evolution than he is trying to disprove his own creationist theories."You don't decide that the bible is true and then go and attempt to prove it."- Kent Hovind's polar opposite.