LiquidFriction (September 7, 2008 at 5:37 am)

Whatever helps you sleep at night.

brengame (September 6, 2008 at 5:51 pm)

nah i was just pointing out that it was not any american inginuity btw its very sad too act hard on youtube u just look stupid

LiquidFriction (September 6, 2008 at 1:45 pm)

Whose we? You act as if you were on the engineering team who devoloped this vehicle. Yanks? Please, keep your petty small minded insignificant remarks to yourself, sounds like someones sore in the ass. You need to get out more, the world doesn't revolve around britain, furthermore barely acknowledges it's existant. So I guess I can see where you Brits get your attitudes from with the need to fight for "claim of existance" of anything Brits actually manage to put of worth in the market.

brengame (September 6, 2008 at 12:32 pm)

yeah but we were in no way inspired by yanks

LiquidFriction (September 5, 2008 at 4:40 am)

Can't compare fighter jets to a vehicle in engineering means. America is by no means "claiming" the existance of this vehicle as all you patriotic brits are quick to jump and start name calling america as a whole. American ingenuity meaning what the british was inspired by when making this product. Do your research before you blindly bash other countries without reason.

andyroo3982 (September 2, 2008 at 9:30 pm)

I Totally agree! British Flair? As if he's saying it was all down the the Americans?Well, no........ Once again the Brits have out classed the Americans.The Americans are too Patriotic and should realise that most engineering have come from British Engineers.Like the Harrier for instance, All British, the Merlin now to be the American presidents new helicopter, All British, And a new VTOL F-35? Where did this idea come from? Oh yes the good old Harrier, Oh yes that's British too!

goata007 (August 29, 2008 at 8:17 pm)

saskwotch is right...the american guy is just selling it.

TMAmusicInc (August 27, 2008 at 10:42 pm)

go brush your teeth faggot

xfbishop (August 23, 2008 at 7:49 am)

i dunno what the point of even bringing F1(or cup car) engines into this discussion is, we are talking about 2 4 cylinder 16v economy car(albeit quick ones) engines, nascar still uses v8's based on the gen1 small block, and formula one engines dont even have camshafts anymore..i guess i could ask, if the honda engine is so perfect, why does ariel need to add a supercharger to it?

robertmyers11 (August 23, 2008 at 2:37 am)

It's true the Honda engine shares no common parts with the F1 racer, but a 747 shares no parts with an F-22 Raptor, but the technology certainly passes on. If the EEK o Tech is so good why didn't Ariel use them to start with? Why does Caterham use Toyota engines and not GM parts? As far as the Cobalt SS being faster than the Civic Type R, I'm sure Honda would gladly put their F1 car up against any Chevy stock car in a race of acceleration, cornering or braking and even GASP! top speed.