|
Jacob139139 (August 27, 2008 at 3:41 am)
lol yeh i did it my own and good 94%.. however this was 2 months ago lol.. thank anyways
vadandetta (August 25, 2008 at 11:14 pm)
this is the chanstake it
thelovebuckles (August 20, 2008 at 11:46 am)
I was with you 'til you said it was Jazz. It ain't. I'd agree with the motion here that it would be better if the conductor was replaced with somebody keeping the eighth note pulse, but it is still enjoyable.
thelovebuckles (August 20, 2008 at 11:38 am)
i'm sure there is somebody who could help you, but i'm gonna tell you to go and do your own assignments. you'll be better for it.
JennLovesMusic (August 1, 2008 at 6:02 pm)
Personally I don't see a problem with conducting for timesake but it shouldsn't be cued--it gives me the sense that this performance was planned which I do not agree with.
tubulard (June 17, 2008 at 5:42 pm)
it's a little annoying to hear all the noise of people talking in the background. If I were there I would be shushing people :P
BlueCougar (June 11, 2008 at 10:45 am)
Conducting this piece totally defies the purpose of "in C". It is meant to be a group process with spontaneous interaction between the players, an improvisation with fixed motifs. I see that the conducter even gives cues, which, sorry, makes it a travesty.
BlueCougar (June 11, 2008 at 10:36 am)
It's not supposed to be conducted as Jazz is not supposed to be conducted. It's a group process, with emphasis on spontaneous interactions between the players. there is nothing to "conduct" in this piece, as it's basically an improvisation with fixed material. A conductor makes this piece look academic. If you got the piano quarter or eighth pulse, everyone keeps on time.
Jacob139139 (June 10, 2008 at 5:25 am)
is there any body that can help me anaylise this song according to the concepts of music? pitch, duration, tone colour etc..for an assignmentplease
PantsandJacket (June 9, 2008 at 4:33 pm)
it's like taking drugs and flying away with butterflies, like a paradise xD I like it! =) |
