|
beenie31 (July 23, 2008 at 1:18 am)
ROUND ASS, FIRM BOOBS, PRETTY LEGS, NICE FACE, TIGHT HOLES, SWEET PUSSY JUICY....ZOOM, DIGITALCAM, TOYS, SOUND, IM NOT SHY. Why You Should See My CAM!: BECAUSE I WANT SHOW YOU WHAT YOU NEVER SEEN BEFORE NOWHERE .............MEEEEEEEEEEE so what you waiting for! come visit me at - Play-Cam _dot_ COM - my user-id there is Sophia-rdrb chat soon on cam :) kjtedcvluyjs
lootra (July 21, 2008 at 9:58 pm)
so virgin really is the commercial master...they own everything from their brand of cola, to trains, NOW THIS!? oh please!!
ryan1111111555555555 (July 20, 2008 at 1:00 am)
tell me how that rollercoaster thing works again?
barpitrider (July 8, 2008 at 1:41 am)
this will open up new doors for people who want to be an astronot. they might would open up schools to train students that dont have to have military training. and air line pilots could up grade their license to space line pilot or some thing like that. but thats just a thought.
JoshuaGodinez (June 11, 2008 at 11:05 pm)
I'm glad someone did a follow-up story on Scaled Composite's explosion, but the description of this video made it seem like there would be more than you would learn from a press release and there wasn't. This was a straightforward booster piece, which is fine with me, rather than what it was described to be.
JamesF63 (May 21, 2008 at 12:47 pm)
I love this stuff. It's a real adventure. However, I really think anti-gravity technology is going to steal the show in the not too distant future.
ogicabp4u (April 21, 2008 at 7:34 pm)
How do you think air travel got started? DUH!
dude58677 (March 13, 2008 at 1:23 pm)
Burt Rutan is the engineer and he is as brilliant as Warner von Braun.There is no heated reentry because the back wings flip up causing drag to slow the descent of the space craft and the slowing of the space craft reduces friction.
fatjohn1408 (March 1, 2008 at 10:28 pm)
the risk is not as high as you think it is. Because it's still at relatively low speeds. They gow as high as what? Mach 3,5? Space shutle endures mach 25. My guess is that it's a little bit unsafer then the concorde which only crashed once in thousands and thousands of flights.
devonair2121 (February 26, 2008 at 8:55 am)
Yes but traveling from L.A. to London using this technology would only take 4 hours at the most. This project not specifically aimed at that, but once it becomes an entrepreneur investment, the science progresses and soon (decade or so) we'll find ourselves traveling the world quickly. |
