|
Norse1974 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Your only talking 3 tenths of a second differance Bro.Mustang GT 13.40's Challenger SRT8 13.10's.Very close between the two.I do like both cars.I am seriously looking at buying a Challenger SRT8 to park next to my 2006GT!IMO these are the two best looking retro rides out there!
notfromohio (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
totally right. i knew the numbers seemed slower. guess it depends on the driver..
305pride (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
lol rape. im getting the rape machine.
blown06tc (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
meant stupid.
blown06tc (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
no, only immature kids call people stupic on the internet, THAT includes YOU.
directorjustin (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
everyone calls people stupid over the internet including YOU.
sugarprobe (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I own a 2007 Mustang GT with tune and CAI. I have not lost to a challenger RT or SRT8 yet. That being said I want a 6 spd challenger RT so bad I can't see straight. I don't care that mustang is a quicker car and don't care that the new camaro will rape this thing. I just love the car and can't wait to get it. Cheers all.
blown06tc (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
directorjustin- WOW! You're so mature calling someone stupid over the internet, you definitely one of those that slipped past the condom.th3ha1og0d-- Sorry I did not know that since I haven't read up on the car. Those guys at inside line need new drivers, lol. I love the styling of the car, I would've bought one if the car did better on the MPG department.
th3ha1og0d (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I've got motortrend right here.Times for the challenger are 4.6 0-60 and 13.1 quarter mile on the MT, and 4.7 0-60 for the auto with the same quarter mile. A stock 300hp mustang will NOT be able to take a challenger.
directorjustin (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i honestly dont care about porformance between the challenger and mustang, the challenger is just cooler and meaner looking. |
