|
CORPARANOID (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Torture is Torture! Do unto other's as you would have done 2yourself. Show some compassion 4your Souls sake. Stand up 4Legal Representation &every individual's right 2a Defense &a Day in court. Gestapo|Nazi tactics are NOT AMERICAN! Is this 1933-1938. No it's 2008 &we are just getting around 2this ISSUE. We should be ASHAMED like those Germans who denied their involvement at Noremburg. Stop Nazi, Storm Troopers, &Gestapo tactics before it's TOO LATE! AMerICAns AWAKEN 2Truth Justice GoldenRULE
AnonymousBChurch (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
watch?v=Vt1-eWU2Ii0"If the president deems that he's got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of a child, there is no law that can stop him?""I think it depends on why the President needs to do that" - John Yoo, United States Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel
AnonymousBChurch (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Of the interrogators: "You could almost see their dicks getting hard as they got new ideas.""Torture at Guantánamo was sanctioned by the most senior advisers to the president, the vice president, and the secretary of defense, according to the international lawyer and professor of law at University College London Philippe Sands, who has conducted a forensic examination of the chain of command leading from the top of the administration to the camp at Guantánamo," Vanity Fair
Nin1963 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
chin, you obviously suffer from"Good German" syndrome.Look it up.
chinojk (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
nin stop posting you are a moron
Nin1963 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist." Sir Winston ChurchillTimely
starcatcher888 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
DacGrp:You mis quoted the article! Who is blinded?That means Saddam held onto it for more than a decade. Why? He hoped to wait out U.N. sanctions on Iraq and start his WMD program anew. This would seem to vindicate Bush's decision to invade.The American Thinker Web site reported four years ago on the scary math behind Saddam's uranium hoard: 500 tons of yellowcake, once refined, could make 142 nuclear weapons.
DacGrp (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You are to blinded by your emotions to objectively research and support your ignorant opinion.StrategyPage July 09, 2008"The uranium oxide was what remained of Saddam's original 1980s nuclear program, the one that was halted by an Israeli air raid in 1981... The uranium oxide has been in storage ever since, and was checked by UN inspectors after the 1991 war."This was the material that was sent to Canada. Only to the Bush administration and their fanatical followers was this a hidden secret.
dilibau (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
hold your horses on that one, it DIDN'T happen, the very intelligent government is still "reviewing" the evidence for holding those poor souls (meaning they must make up new lies)
starcatcher888 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
But yellowcake wasn't all they found at Tuwaitha. According to the AP, the military also discovered "four devices for controlled radiation exposure . . . that could potentially be used in a weapon."By the way, this should put to rest the canard peddled by the American left and by former Ambassador Joseph Wilson that "Bush lied" about Iraq seeking yellowcake from the African country of Niger. |
