UserUK201 (July 11, 2008 at 9:07 am)

Actually new evidence suggests it could have been upwards of 75,000 Romans killed.

Mammoth1993 (July 3, 2008 at 9:14 pm)

i think so :P

stakeee (July 3, 2008 at 9:09 pm)

lolthats hard work! xD

Neuenkirchner (June 28, 2008 at 9:35 am)

aso thx

Exe101 (June 26, 2008 at 2:30 pm)

Das Lied heißt "Requiem for a Tower"

Neuenkirchner (June 26, 2008 at 10:33 am)

das lied ab 2.00mins

Exe101 (June 23, 2008 at 2:29 pm)

welches meinst du?

Neuenkirchner (June 21, 2008 at 9:11 pm)

WELCHES LIED IS DAS????

Mammoth1993 (June 7, 2008 at 6:20 pm)

I've read somewhere that Hannibal slaughtered about 60,000 (!) Romans and killed one of the consuls. it took Hannibal only 8 hours to do this which means that on average you need to kill at least a 100 men per minute. this also means that it is the record of killing people in a single day (it took only 8 hours). it is pretty amazing to imagine that half of my town could have been the Romans and would be slaughtered in just 8 hours :)ooh yeah, Hannibal had only 8,000 losses XD

xScorpioN12x (March 29, 2008 at 12:59 pm)

Yes you are right.The battle of cannae was placed in an open place