|
startstatic00 (June 9, 2008 at 2:18 pm)
fucking idiots
sqreeze (June 8, 2008 at 9:40 am)
lol the z4's front end looks like crap, get real, the s2000 is no looker either but, don't kid yourself
missedagain (June 7, 2008 at 8:03 am)
You're insane if you think the interior or comfort/luxury of the S2000 comes anywhere NEAR the Z4.
missedagain (June 7, 2008 at 8:02 am)
Or, you're buying a car that looks better, has a much more luxury interior and options/gadgets, has a smoother more comfortable ride overall, and carries itself an image that is quite a bit more respectable than the boy-ricer image of the honda S2000.
girtler87 (June 6, 2008 at 7:34 am)
I'm 6'6" and I drive a S2000 everyday, you must be retarded or too fat to be driving a S2000, either way you fail
mrdauntless (June 4, 2008 at 2:55 am)
looks pretty though. I would go with the MX-5 to tell you the truth
redbaron520 (June 4, 2008 at 2:01 am)
Ya, makes no sense at all. I would never buy a CR personally though. The suspension is really firm as is on the normal S. So around town it breaks ur back over pot holes hehe. either way, I agree with your conclusion on the CR.
mrdauntless (June 4, 2008 at 1:54 am)
The hardtop adds alot to the price. The sad thing is if you add the same stuff to the S it cost like 39k and the Honda CR cost 37 with the same stuff and better. MAkes no sense. like alot of things. If yu buy a soda from the end of an checkout lane it is 1.49 if you buy a two liter it is 1.73
redbaron520 (June 3, 2008 at 8:56 pm)
The S2000 has all the accessories included into the price. It's a cheaper car for the same performance and benefits.
mrdauntless (June 3, 2008 at 3:10 am)
I knew that all the stuff you said so did evryone else. I do agree that the corvette i nice no matter which one. The BMW is still a nice car. Its more about a comfortable sport car. Leather. Racing seats. ect... |
