charlieflint (July 24, 2008 at 7:00 pm)

I like this car, a lot! :) Zakov, give it a rest dude, you've cut and pasted the exact same passage of text several times now, lol!I think this is the best project car I've seen for a little while now!

halcc4 (July 23, 2008 at 9:23 pm)

hot girl

Zakov318 (July 20, 2008 at 10:46 pm)

OK! But the difference is that Honda engine is waking up on very high rpm, because before is nothing. That's why you have to all the time twisting engine in to high rpm to get power. BMW engine is giving you power any time. That's why BMW is better... Japanese should learn from BMW, and finally learn that good engine is giving you power any time, not only on high rpm...

DjSpecter87 (July 19, 2008 at 7:16 am)

Am I the only one who say what happend at 3:06??? Her skirt went up and you could see some pantys. lol pepperment!!!!

DRIFTCKOWN (July 13, 2008 at 9:39 am)

UPSKIRT!

flatthump (June 21, 2008 at 11:23 pm)

I'm sorry, you're right. It was ALfa Romeo that I was thinking of.I don't know if I'd say variable vane is pointless. It's been proven to provide much more low end boost response over twin scroll 'non-variable vane' turbos.

Lordnicon999 (June 15, 2008 at 10:34 pm)

Well it sill moves nicely :)

Lordnicon999 (June 15, 2008 at 10:30 pm)

I just want to ask one thing... WHY!? I could imagine if they threw the turbo on it but.... why?

mugenman6 (June 15, 2008 at 10:11 pm)

Vanos, or varios as others know it came after Vtech. But they are first to use variable cam placement that variates which lobe profiles are used (ferrari). Variable vane is pretty much pointless, theres alot of other simple things you can do to get the same advantage.

kurac3000 (June 7, 2008 at 11:04 am)

u know nothing. the bmw engine suits this car better because it's got more torque which this car needs since it's quite heavy