xephrone (August 24, 2008 at 2:45 pm)

there's an animation delay in CUBE, while in BALANCE, there's almost no animation delay... plus i s*ck at counting, really.. analyzing is a lot better for me.. but thats just me, mind you..

xephrone (August 24, 2008 at 2:43 pm)

nonono dude.. you got it wrong..

hazelsight (August 18, 2008 at 3:29 am)

Just another thing about cubes is that you don't have to COUNT- you just guess, and like you can visualize approximately how many cubes are there. Like I get 9 out of 10 guesses right.

hazelsight (August 17, 2008 at 3:04 pm)

Just another thing to add. In cubes, if you're lucky you can get the easy 12s or 16s which can additionally add you 44 points within like, 1.5 seconds? And shape order is definately a good choice- it made my score improve a lot, actually i started with 500 as max score in shape order and now 800 after i started 2 name the shapes! 3200 within 20 games- because of such a huge improvement of 300 in shape order and a faster speed missing number.

hazelsight (August 17, 2008 at 3:03 pm)

are you talking about me?

hazelsight (August 17, 2008 at 2:57 pm)

The weight balance game takes up a lot of analyzing time in the later stages- its like you have to look at all 4 scales and my eye can't rotate that fast. For cubes, you can count them down as their dropping which makes it easier in the later stages which there are 15+ cubes.

HorseMan50 (August 16, 2008 at 11:12 pm)

Yes.

xephrone (August 14, 2008 at 1:32 pm)

yeah, like totally(?)

xephrone (August 14, 2008 at 1:31 pm)

cube's +49pts, but the time spent on counting would be a lot.. some ppl are a lot better at analyzing(scale) than calculating(cube).. 1100 is easier to do in the weight balance game... well,at least for me..

YardenSwimmer (August 13, 2008 at 4:41 am)

facking chiter