|
silvike (August 16, 2008 at 11:04 am)
1.36 turned my heart all gooey.I absolutely agree that no breed is more vicious than what the owner makes it into.Restrict the owners and force them to be more responsible instead of hating and wiping out a race of animals.My two cents.
mlaurencepo (August 12, 2008 at 4:29 pm)
"There is no scientific proof that genetics cause a breed of dog to be aggressive, vicious or dangerous." - testimony from Standing Committee on amendments to the Dog Owners Liability Act. 2005 No breed of dog has more than 0.1% of its members involved in serious biting incidents...meaning...99.9% of all dogs, regardless of breed, never attack anyone. No reasonable person can suggest restricting 99.9% of ANY group based on the actions of such a tiny minority.
mlaurencepo (August 11, 2008 at 2:53 pm)
Best Am. Staff,Am. Pitbull,Staff terrier video I've seen. There are five different types of "pit-bulls". people need to be selective when they breed,so they don't keep thinning out the bloodlines and creating more health issues in such a stable breed. A standard was made for a reason.
BIGZUKA91 (August 7, 2008 at 6:07 pm)
pits are going to be with the poler bears EXTINCT!!!!! beacuse of bsl! they hav no more mercy for sertan dogs!!!!!!!!
loiacano2002 (August 7, 2008 at 4:33 am)
Ok fast one are you ready. The AKC only allows Staffy's to be registered NOT apbt.The UKC allows pitbull to be registered. Along with this, the saffy is registered un the term apbt also with the UKC. You can not have a pit them register with the ACK as a Staffy. There for it's a different breed.I'm sorry my last comment might have lost you.I'm sorry you cant comprehend simple thinking.
IMOZZA (August 6, 2008 at 5:23 pm)
Thankyou, but clearly your the fuckin retard!! like the rest of the people on here who think the staffy and apbt is a different breed!! "the both"!? "staffy and apbt"!? "the AKC dosent"!? What the fuck do you mean make SENSE! look at fangedgrin's comment about primo! basically contradicting himself saying the recognised AKC 'staffie' orginated from a pit bull!!? You YANKS are thick as fuck!
DoughBoyAndBEAR (August 6, 2008 at 2:57 am)
If you have a license then your dog would have to be registered too you. And if they found the dogs fighting.or a dead dog on the side of the road, They would easily be able to link it back too you and your dog fighting ring ( no matter what the breed ) .. All tho Really if they did do that, it would take a long time to get any effect if ever,People would just hide and breed there pits in basements, Keep em away from windows. and move them place to place in bags or boxes ..
loiacano2002 (August 5, 2008 at 11:19 pm)
Imozza your a fucking retard. A "American Pitbull" is a breed. The ukc sees is as both!The both would be a staffy and a apbt. The AKC dosent.
loiacano2002 (August 5, 2008 at 11:16 pm)
If a certain group of people cant buy a certain kind of dog do to there license or (do to money income?) Would make them fight the kinda of dog they can get. So in all, you'd block good people from have this kind of breed or other breeds. This will not help at all!!
DoughBoyAndBEAR (August 5, 2008 at 8:02 am)
It's Simple, To own a dog you should have to have a license for it like you would have to have to own a gun (not saying dogs are like guns tho) And i think Different breeds of dog should require a higher level of a license, So to own a breed of dog you would have to show proof that you have the money and the house to give that breed a proper home. I believe that would at lest cut down on people breeding for the wrong reasons and help Cut down on Buying dogs for fights |