|
1nf3rnus0153 (October 13, 2008 at 12:27 am)
that VERY TINY CHANCE that he did NOT do it..means that there is a possibility that he may really NOT have done it..no matter what the probability is...if there is no valid proof, that means you're just ACCUSING him of something that he may really NOT have done..
dancingfrida (October 12, 2008 at 6:36 pm)
2005SpudWebb....If there were a constant inflow of young teenage girls with nice round asses that spent the weekend over at your secluded mansion,would you be strong enough to resist temptation?????Well,there were a lot of young blonde-hair boys,with innocent white asses.....do you think Michael was strong enough to resist temptation????
2005SpudWebb (October 12, 2008 at 5:25 pm)
no, oj is definitly guilty, but mj is innocent
dancingfrida (October 12, 2008 at 4:06 am)
1nf3rnus0153....There's a very tiny chance he did not sexually molest some of these kids.....................but,any parent who would let their young white child stay overnight with a kinky blank person,should be sentenced to several years in prison.
1nf3rnus0153 (October 11, 2008 at 11:17 pm)
just cuz he's a weird guy, u think that he really did it even though there was no valid proof.. doesn't that mean that ur just accusing him something that he may NOT have done...? i mean.. u said it urself.. "michael is the weirdess person I've ever seen, anything is possible" then that means it IS possible that he did NOT do it...right..?
madeinbarmston (October 11, 2008 at 1:22 pm)
i'm sorry but if it was my child, no money in the world would stop me prosecuting, it says more about the parents in my view. don't get me wrong, i despise paedophiles but as their was no conviction, it is down to personal opinion. watch a doc called michael jackson: what really happened, with jaques peretti. that should be the deciding factor. i think he did, but these videos are about his music, if you want to watch stories about his private life do so, comment on them instead of these.
PIPO2283 (October 11, 2008 at 9:17 am)
trop fort !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dancingfrida (October 10, 2008 at 9:26 pm)
maybe O.J. and Michael are innocent,but I really doubt it.
dancingfrida (October 10, 2008 at 9:24 pm)
michael is the weirdess person I've ever seen,anything is possible.I mean he could possibly have a vagina instead of a penis.I mean how many blacks have you seen turn white and have straight hair?......Would you let your 8 year old white son spend the weekend with Michael?
juvan99 (October 10, 2008 at 9:15 pm)
hmm... is that consider as an evidence that Michael Jackson himself really did it...? |