DrewDawg50 (August 20, 2008 at 8:56 pm)

The worse thing about Bush is that his daughters haven't been in Playboy yet. They should really get to that before they get too old.

NastevilsBack (August 7, 2008 at 9:47 pm)

Oh boy, getting this shit from a 19 year old punk ass kid. I'm sure you will want the last word just like the little girl you are.Go ahead, I'm waiting....

DropThought (August 7, 2008 at 9:43 pm)

Arrogance is not associated with a neutral examination of a being. I say you are silly because you are silly.And as to 'silly' indicating homosexual, I believe, yet again, you have been misinformed.Some definitions of silly to help further your understanding:Silly- cockamamie, ludicrous, foolish, airheaded, pathetic, inspiring scornful pityBoy- one who demonstrates a lack of a man's experiences through one's actions/beliefs.No mention of homosexuality I can find.....Silly boy. :D

NastevilsBack (August 7, 2008 at 9:32 pm)

You have picked up olbermann's hyperbole and arrogance quite well. Your use of "silly boy" indicates you are also a homosexual.

DropThought (August 7, 2008 at 8:10 pm)

HEY before you post that comment, youtube user, will it be more entertaining then the discussion already on this page? If so, go for it :D

DropThought (August 7, 2008 at 7:57 pm)

No you don't, you silly boy. You're on youtube. Don't feel bad that you were proven wrong, boy. Don't argue it. Accept it and move on, knowing your beliefs are flawed. Either enforce them with fact or admit that, while you may have existed as a human for 40 years, you are a silly silly silly boy. A two year old is more mature that you, as a two year old would not use the beliefs handed to them by society to argue truth.Silly boy. Silly boy. Silly boy.

NastevilsBack (August 7, 2008 at 7:53 pm)

I'm not a boy you 19 year old punk. I'm a 40 year old man now run along I have work to do you stupid, smug, piece of crap.

DropThought (August 7, 2008 at 7:49 pm)

And before you argue it, silly boy, please research so you know what you talk about. Seriously. 5 minutes of research to prove me wrong. I'd love it.

DropThought (August 7, 2008 at 7:47 pm)

No, the Nielsen numbers are unconfirmable and, thus, serve opinion rather than truth. As you do.And 9/11 was welcomed by our government, not caused by. Vigilant Guardian anyone? Yeah, that was an exercise running on 911 to test our reaction planes flying into a buildings, among other.Just likeWWII: Australia warns us 3 days before Pearl Harbor. It happens, a 80%+ disapproval turns into 1,000,000 enlisted men.WWI: The Lusitania passenger ship is loaded with ammo and sent into a warzone.

NastevilsBack (August 7, 2008 at 7:11 pm)

So you think the Nielsen numbers are made up?Do you also think our govt. did 9/11?