|
piike1992 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
should have done the seen with the teacher and the petting =)
guzzabub (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I actually understood the book(because i'm a nerd like that)And im only 12 years old, I think that book was great,I read it 2 months ago the slang was a little problem but later I knew what it meant later on.
ImmortalArtist09 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I don't usually like reading but catcher in the rye was the best book I have ever read
thewho0806 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this is a fucking diss servise 2 the greatist book ever writtern
IKillYouVids (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That book was amazing^^ a lot more enjoyable then i thought it would be
MadcapVagrant (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You're spot on with that last remark.
JapaneseWolf17 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Just because someone is young doesnt mean they cant understand the book.
JapaneseWolf17 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Im almost done with the book.Its really goooddd i love it.the guy that played as holden caulfield sucked at acting. he made holden seem plain o.Obut who cares , right? :D
bu3asalli (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i agree catcher in the rye is meant for teens and older, you can't get the idea of grieve over loss innocence before you actually lose your innocence, sure kids are smart they are underestimated but intellectual cleverness shouldn't be confused with emotional maturity
bu3asalli (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i totally get what you are sayingi finished a few months ago |
